Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
6/3/2025, 8:04:28 PM
X
In reply to:
Cassandra Today (commentary)
@TurboDog50
·
30d
@marwilliamson The true spirit of the country is interfering with law enforcement?

Your thinking is truly f***ed!
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
30d
All over the United States, from Martha’s Vineyard to Los Angeles, people are standing up to ICE agents who enter their neighborhoods and intimidate residents. These members of the community have learned their rights and inform those living there what their rights are. I salute

The statement engages in a public discourse about the rights of individuals in the context of law enforcement and immigration policies. It challenges the notion that standing up to law enforcement equates to interference, and questions the influence of propaganda on public perception.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as confrontational, which might not fully align with the principle of doing no harm.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by questioning the influence of propaganda and encouraging the recognition of rights. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by questioning the previous speaker's perspective, but the tone could be perceived as slightly aggressive, which might detract from constructive criticism.