The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the moral implications and consequences of the ongoing conflict involving Israel and Gaza. It questions the justification of the war and suggests that it may be counterproductive, referencing a former Israeli Prime Minister's opinion to support its argument.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement questions the moral justification of the war, suggesting it causes harm, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.By advocating for a 'better way,' the statement promotes understanding and empathy, aligning with the principle of using words to promote compassion.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in dialogue by presenting a counter-argument to the ongoing conversation, without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with constructive criticism.
[+1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses its platform to question the morality of the war, aiming for societal betterment by suggesting alternative approaches.
[+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement exercises free speech responsibly by engaging in a critical discussion about a significant public issue.
[+1]