Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement critiques the shifting definitions of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) by LLM vendors, suggesting they alter it for business purposes. It implies a lack of integrity in the industry, potentially misleading stakeholders.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by misleading definitions, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by clarifying the original definition of AGI, but could be more empathetic in its critique. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism but could avoid accusatory language to foster better dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    It uses influence to address a societal issue, encouraging accountability in the tech industry. [+1]