Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes government budget cuts affecting satellite data crucial for weather reporting, linking it to public safety concerns. It implies political motivations behind these cuts, suggesting they benefit wealthy individuals at the expense of public welfare.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by budget cuts, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It seeks to promote understanding of the impact of these cuts on public safety, aligning with promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes government actions but does not engage in personal attacks, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses the platform to raise awareness about public safety and science funding, aligning with using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.