Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques MSNBC's perceived inconsistency in its stance on third-party candidates, suggesting a bias towards corporate interests. It implies that the media outlet is protecting the status quo rather than genuinely opposing third-party candidates. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived media bias.
- The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by accusing a media outlet of bias without providing detailed evidence, which might contribute to public distrust. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism without fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue or evidence, leaning towards an accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.