Mehrdad Farajtabar
@MFarajtabar
·
208d
The statement critiques the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) and reasoning models, suggesting that recent findings should discredit their perceived reasoning capabilities. The tone is assertive and dismissive, implying that the models are overhyped and lack true reasoning ability.
- The statement could be seen as dismissive, potentially undermining constructive dialogue about the capabilities and limitations of LLMs. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses the work on LLMs without engaging in a nuanced discussion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses a metaphor that suggests finality rather than encouraging further exploration or dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.