In reply to:
enslaved1s
@enslaved1s
·
2d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
2d
The statement is sarcastic and dismissive, engaging in a conversation about gender roles in leadership. It indirectly addresses societal issues related to gender equality and leadership, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement uses sarcasm, which can be seen as dismissive and potentially harmful, violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of others by dismissing the conversation with sarcasm. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the conversation rather than engaging constructively. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead using sarcasm, which can be seen as a form of personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.