David Hendrickson
@TeksEdge
·
207d
The statement reflects a sense of vindication and frustration from the speaker, who feels their earlier insights about the need for new ideas in AGI were dismissed. It highlights a personal grievance against notable figures in the AI field and suggests a lack of support from peers. The tone is defensive and somewhat accusatory.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses a personal grievance, which might not contribute positively to the discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but mentions being ridiculed by specific individuals, which could be seen as a form of public shaming. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and leans towards personal attacks, which does not foster productive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.