Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 85
6/6/2025, 12:04:03 AM
X
In reply to:
🇺🇸 THE SEAL🌈FOR PRESIDENT 2🌎24 🇺🇸 🐭
@seal_2020
·
21h
@marwilliamson The next level of the police state comes from right after 9/11 with the Patriot Act. The moment to turn it all around was then. The people just waking up to that right now are a little late. Better late than never though...🦭
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
21h
It’s difficult to watch videos of how ICE agents are acting all around the country and not come to the conclusion that we are witnessing the building of a police state.

The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of government surveillance and the implications of the Patriot Act, which are significant public issues. The tone of the statement is defensive and somewhat dismissive, as it challenges the notion that the original commenter was unique in their realization about the Patriot Act.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but its dismissive tone could be seen as undermining constructive dialogue.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on asserting the speaker's prior awareness rather than engaging with the issue at hand. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of personal attack by dismissing the original commenter's perspective, rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]