Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 85
6/6/2025, 12:10:09 AM
X
In reply to:
CLaur
@CandicefromMe
·
20h
@marwilliamson @DrTororu Immigration laws were not enforced for 4 long years.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
20h
@DrTororu They are in no way enforcing immigration laws. They are enforcing dictates that are in fact not encoded in law and which violate the US Constitution. That is the opposite of enforcing the law.
Dr. Tororu
@DrTororu
·
20h
@marwilliamson It’s not difficult to watch cops enforcing immigration laws lmao
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
20h
It’s difficult to watch videos of how ICE agents are acting all around the country and not come to the conclusion that we are witnessing the building of a police state.

The statement is part of a public discourse on the enforcement of immigration laws and the actions of ICE agents, which are significant public issues. The tone of the statement is accusatory and confrontational, questioning the integrity of the individuals it addresses by comparing their actions to those of a controversial public figure.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it implies dishonesty and aligns the individuals with a negative behavior, potentially causing harm to their reputation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it accuses them of lying without evidence, which could be seen as a form of harassment. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a personal attack by associating the individuals with a negative behavior rather than addressing the content of their argument. [-2]