In reply to:
Daniel Litt
@littmath
·
206d
The statement and image reflect a personal reaction to being blocked by a public figure, which is part of a broader conversation critiquing that figure's impact on public discourse. The tone is somewhat lighthearted, referring to the block as a 'badge of honor,' suggesting a sense of pride or validation in being blocked by someone they criticize.
- The statement does not directly harm others but is part of a critical dialogue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not revealing private information but engages in a public critique.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.