Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes the US for imposing sanctions on ICC judges, suggesting these actions are unlawful and impede justice. It references Article 70 of the Rome Statute, which deals with crimes against the administration of justice, implying that the US actions may violate international law.
- The statement aims to highlight perceived injustices, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for legal integrity. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By referencing international law, the statement promotes understanding of legal frameworks, aligning with promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes US actions but does not engage in personal attacks, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to address international legal issues, aligning with using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.