Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue involving the University of Michigan's alleged use of undercover investigators to surveil pro-Palestinian student groups. The tone is investigative and critical, aiming to expose potentially unethical practices by a public institution. The intent is to inform the public and possibly incite dialogue or action regarding the university's actions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but highlights potentially harmful actions by the university, aligning with the principle by aiming to prevent harm through exposure. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on institutional actions rather than personal attacks on individuals involved. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By exposing these actions, the statement promotes understanding and empathy for the affected students, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the university's actions without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to potentially influence public opinion and policy for societal betterment by addressing a public concern. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using its platform to report on a public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.