Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques a legislative provision that restricts state and local regulation of AI, highlighting potential negative impacts on zoning and residential areas. It raises concerns about corporate influence and community safety.
- The statement aims to inform the public about potential harms, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by explaining the implications of the bill, fostering awareness and empathy for affected communities. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the bill, focusing on its potential consequences rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.