In reply to:
Russell Brandom
@russellbrandom
·
204d
The statement engages in a discussion about geopolitical implications and national security measures, referencing CFIUS (Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States) and the Defense Production Act. This indicates a substantive engagement with public issues, specifically related to national security and international relations.
- The statement does not cause harm and is neutral in tone, focusing on factual information.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement contributes to understanding by bringing up relevant national security measures, promoting informed discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by adding relevant information to the conversation without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to contribute to a public discussion on national security. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.