Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement is a strong, opinionated commentary on the Israeli blockade of Gaza and the actions of activists, including Greta Thunberg, who are attempting to deliver aid. It uses charged language to describe the situation and calls for public attention to the activists' efforts.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or harassment, but the use of the term 'genocidal' could be interpreted as hate speech against a nation, which violates the principle of respecting dignity. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote empathy and compassion for the people of Gaza by highlighting the activists' efforts, aligning with this principle. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead using charged language that could hinder productive discussion, violating this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to draw attention to a humanitarian issue, which aligns with using influence for societal betterment. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so with charged language, which may not be responsible or uphold integrity, partially violating this principle. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.