Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement discusses a political issue involving a decision by a public figure (Trump) regarding a NASA nominee, which is influenced by political donations. It highlights the intersection of politics, public appointments, and personal biases, contributing to civic dialogue about governance and transparency.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a decision based on political bias, which could indirectly harm public trust. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on political maneuvering rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but highlights a political decision based on partisan considerations.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for societal betterment, as it suggests decisions are made based on political donations rather than merit. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on political actions, but the integrity of the decision-making process is questionable.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.