In reply to:
Prem Kumar Aparanji 🤖👶🏼🐘
@prem_k
·
203d
The statement is part of a conversation about a paper discussing the strengths and limitations of reasoning models, which is a topic of public interest in the field of AI. The tone is lighthearted and references past discussions on the topic, indicating a long-standing engagement with the subject.
- The statement does no harm and is part of a constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by referencing past discussions and aligning with the current topic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.