Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
6/7/2025, 1:00:53 PM
X
In reply to:
Prem Kumar Aparanji 🤖👶🏼🐘
@prem_k
·
203d
@GaryMarcus @wolfejosh @rao2z Not discounting you or what I've learnt from you at all, Gary. ☺️

It's just that with the LRM, in particular, @rao2z has been on point throughout, and has now come out with so many studies to back them up too.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
203d
@prem_k @wolfejosh @rao2z this traces a bit of the history back to 1998: https://garymarcus.substack.com/…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
203d
@prem_k @wolfejosh @rao2z since it follows exactly the line of thought re OOD that i argued in
1998
1999
2001
2012
2018
2019
2020
2022
etc
i shall accept Josh’s choice of verb
Prem Kumar Aparanji 🤖👶🏼🐘
@prem_k
·
203d
@wolfejosh More like Rao'd with this one 😄

@rao2z @GaryMarcus
Josh Wolfe
@wolfejosh
·
203d
Apple just GaryMarcus'd LLM reasoning ability

The statement engages in a technical discussion about AI models, specifically focusing on reasoning and generalization. It references ongoing debates and studies in the field, indicating a substantive engagement with public issues related to AI development and its implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and contributes to a technical discussion, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a detailed discussion about AI reasoning models, contributing to the broader discourse on AI capabilities. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by referencing studies and arguments, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]