Reposted by Marianne Williamson
The statement criticizes the actions of an ICE agent, questioning the appropriateness of firearm use in a tense situation involving a bystander. It highlights concerns about law enforcement practices and the emotional impact on the bystander's family.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by the agent's actions, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy of the individuals involved by not revealing personal details, but it does criticize the agent's actions, which could be seen as a form of public accountability rather than harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement seeks to promote empathy by drawing attention to the emotional distress of the bystander, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the agent's actions, which could be seen as constructive if it leads to dialogue about proper law enforcement practices. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.