Marianne Williamson

The statement uses a rhetorical question to challenge the logic of deporting illegal immigrants based on the actions of a few, by comparing it to the idea of deporting native-born Americans for similar crimes. The tone is sarcastic and aims to highlight perceived inconsistencies in the argument for deportation based on crime prevention.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but uses sarcasm, which could be perceived as dismissive or inflammatory, potentially escalating the conversation. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as disrespectful to those holding opposing views.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses sarcasm rather than constructive dialogue to make a point. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks but uses a rhetorical device that may not foster constructive dialogue.