Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47

Score 55

@daledwayer That vetting process is exactly what Congress has failed to provide. No one wants criminals here, obviously. But who they are taking is so far beyond that. Plus there was an $8B BI-PARTISAN bill that would have helped a lot, that Trump told GOP not to vote for because it would

6/7/2025, 5:07:34 PM

In reply to:

daledwayer

@daledwayer

@marwilliamson It's difficult to watch some of these raids. But one child or woman suffering abuse, rape or murder from an illegal alien is too much. People who entered illegally should be deported and reenter through a vetting process. There are too many bad guys, and the human trafficking

Marianne Williamson

@marwilliamson

To any Trump voters out there, I ask this sincerely so please don't answer rudely:

1) Do you really think these ICE raids are going to make this country safer? Clearly they're not just taking "the bad guys," the criminals.

2) Do you really think it's going to save Amerian

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the effectiveness of immigration policies, specifically the vetting process and a bipartisan bill related to immigration reform. It critiques Congress and the Trump administration's handling of these issues, contributing to the civic dialogue on immigration policy.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on policy critique rather than personal attacks, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement attempts to promote understanding by discussing the complexities of immigration policy and the potential benefits of a bipartisan bill, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of Congress and the Trump administration's actions without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
By discussing a significant public issue and advocating for a bipartisan solution, the statement uses influence for societal betterment, aligning with this principle. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing public policy issues and critiquing government actions with integrity. [+1]