In reply to:
John Erikson
@JohnNorTroll
·
10d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the impact of U.S. foreign policy and the consequences of shutting down aid programs, which are significant public issues. The tone is informative and seeks to highlight the negative consequences of policy decisions.
- The statement strives to do no harm by highlighting the negative consequences of shutting down aid programs, which aligns with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by drawing attention to the plight of those affected by the shutdown of aid programs. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a previous comment without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about the impact of policy decisions on vulnerable populations, contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing public policy issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.