In reply to:
Wendy
@wendyweeww
·
44d
The statement involves a discussion about recognition and credit in academic or technological work, which can be considered public discourse as it touches on issues of intellectual property and recognition in the tech industry. The tone is supportive, aiming to acknowledge someone's contributions.
- The statement does no harm and instead aims to give credit where it is due, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By acknowledging someone's work, the statement promotes understanding and empathy, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the issue of recognition without personal attacks, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.