Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques the current state and perception of language models, suggesting that they have reached a developmental plateau despite significant investment. It challenges the belief in their potential to achieve true intelligence, contrasting with a more optimistic view expressed in a related conversation.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as dismissive of those who work on or believe in the potential of language models. However, it does not engage in harmful language or actions, so it neither adheres to nor violates this principle significantly.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it takes a critical stance without offering constructive insights or alternatives. It could be seen as dismissive, which slightly violates this principle. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of language models and the faith placed in them, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It adheres to this principle by focusing on the topic rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and critiques a significant technological issue, which is a responsible use of a platform. However, the tone could be more constructive, so it slightly adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.