Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the limitations and future potential of large language models (LLMs), which is a topic of public interest in the fields of technology and employment. It references a public figure's opinion, suggesting a need for further breakthroughs in AI technology.
- The statement does no harm and is a neutral observation about the current state of AI technology. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging the current capabilities and limitations of LLMs, encouraging a realistic view of AI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by referencing an expert's opinion without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a meaningful discussion on AI technology. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.