Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in a discussion about AI and reasoning models, referencing a paper by Apple. It acknowledges criticism and humorously points out perceived inconsistencies in critics' past statements. The tone is lighthearted and somewhat mocking, focusing on the ongoing debate about AI capabilities.
- The statement does not cause harm but uses humor to make a point.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but lightly mocks critics, which could be seen as dismissive.ย [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a public debate about AI.ย [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in dialogue but includes a mocking tone, which could detract from constructive criticism.ย [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.