Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47

Score 64

Healthy and unhealthy strategies for coping with the Apple paper:

- attack Apple for publishing it (which does nothing to address the underlying problems they pointed out)

or

- figure out its implications and develop a robust alternative (the healthier option)

Andrew White 🐦‍⬛

@andrewwhite01

31d

Apple's AI researchers have embraced a kind of anti-LLM cynic ethos, publishing multiple papers trying to argue that reasoning LLMs are somehow limited/cannot generalize.

Apple also has the worst AI products (Siri, Apple Intlligence).

No idea what their "strategy" is here

6/8/2025, 3:56:21 PM

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing strategies for responding to Apple's research on AI limitations. It contrasts unproductive criticism with constructive problem-solving, promoting a healthier approach to addressing technological challenges.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement promotes a constructive approach, encouraging solutions rather than unproductive criticism, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
By advocating for understanding and developing alternatives, it promotes empathy and constructive engagement. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement encourages constructive criticism and dialogue, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on problem-solving. [+1]