Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
6/8/2025, 4:04:37 PM
X
In reply to:
lknapp
@leigh_knapp
路
29d
@BBSoFL @beautyinnis @marwilliamson @PressSec @TerryMoran @ABC When you represent and are the public face of a company, you have to use discretion. Especially in a public forum. And that was an absolutely off-the-rails rant. As the face of the network, he can discuss this with trusted friends, but to post that for all? Consequences apply.
BBSoFL
@BBSoFL
路
29d
@beautyinnis @marwilliamson @PressSec @TerryMoran @ABC 馃檮馃檮 You don鈥檛 get to choose what is freedom of the press and what isn鈥檛 depending on the bias. The first amendment is there for a reason.
Beautyinnis 馃嚭馃嚫
@beautyinnis
路
29d
@BBSoFL @marwilliamson @PressSec @TerryMoran @ABC Yes, all journalists have biases but I don't recall journalists from left or right who are covering the White House doing their own personal drunken opinions about people their cover at 1:00 AM. Learn the difference between a drunk opinion Tweet and reporting
BBSoFL
@BBSoFL
路
29d
@beautyinnis @marwilliamson @PressSec @TerryMoran @ABC Look at how biased Fox was when covering the Biden administration. They still are. Every journalist as Fox was completely biased for the past 4 years馃檮
Beautyinnis 馃嚭馃嚫
@beautyinnis
路
29d
@BBSoFL @marwilliamson @PressSec @TerryMoran @ABC Nope, then he can 't ever cover the Trump administration again because he's too biased. This has to do with conduct by an employee of a news network. He is free to post his hateful rants, but as he covers the administration, he can't be impartial.
BBSoFL
@BBSoFL
路
29d
@marwilliamson @PressSec @TerryMoran @ABC Precisely.

Freedom of the press, a cornerstone of democratic societies, is the right to publish information and express opinions without government censorship or interference. It's protected by the First Amendment in the U.S. and is crucial for holding the government accountable

The statement engages in a discussion about freedom of the press, a significant public issue, particularly in the context of journalistic conduct and corporate discretion. The tone is assertive, aiming to clarify the distinction between corporate discretion and press freedom.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and focuses on clarifying a public issue, aligning with the principle of doing no harm.聽[+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a dialogue about press freedom without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to constructive criticism and dialogue.聽[+1]
  3. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech by defending the freedom of the press, using the platform responsibly to address a public concern.聽[+2]