Jill Stien

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -43

The statement criticizes Israel's actions and calls for international intervention, framing the situation as a threat to a peaceful humanitarian mission. It uses strong language to describe Israel's actions as unlawful and inflammatory, urging governments to protect the civilians involved.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to prevent harm by urging governments to intervene, but its accusatory tone may escalate tensions.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the dignity of those on the relief ship but uses inflammatory language against Israel, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes empathy for the humanitarian mission but lacks a balanced perspective, potentially reducing understanding. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in criticism of Israel's actions but does so in a confrontational manner, which may hinder constructive dialogue. [-1]