Jill Stien

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -43

The statement addresses a significant international issue involving potential conflict and legal interpretations, thus constituting public discourse. It presents a legal opinion on the actions of a state, suggesting that blocking the Madleen would be unlawful. The tone is assertive, aiming to inform and possibly mobilize public opinion.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for adherence to international law, but it could escalate tensions by framing the situation as an act of aggression.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding of international law, but the assertive tone may not foster empathy or compassion between conflicting parties.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of potential actions by a state, but the strong language could be seen as confrontational. [-1]