The statement and linked article address the public issue of the firing of Carla Hayden from the Library of Congress, suggesting political motivations and broader implications for libraries and archives under the Trump administration. The tone is critical and implies a negative view of the actions taken by the administration.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of the Trump administration's actions, which could be seen as harmful to public institutions like libraries.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on public figures and actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the political context affecting libraries, though it may lack empathy towards the administration's perspective.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but criticizes the actions of the administration, which could be seen as lacking constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight issues affecting public institutions, aiming to inform the public. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing public actions and their implications, using the platform to inform and critique responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.