Marianne Williamson

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of using force against protesters, referencing the historical event of the Kent State shootings. It questions the morality and justification of such actions, contributing to a broader discussion on protest, civil rights, and state response.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but questions the morality of a harmful action, aligning with the principle by challenging harmful rhetoric. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does respond to a conversation that includes potentially harmful rhetoric.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by questioning the justification of violence against protesters, encouraging empathy for those affected. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in dialogue by questioning another's viewpoint without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to constructive criticism. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   Not applicable as the statement does not involve acknowledging or correcting mistakes.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to challenge harmful rhetoric, contributing to societal betterment by advocating for non-violence. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning the use of force against protesters. [+1]