Jill Stien

The statement suggests that the issue of fascism is not limited to one political party, implying that both parties contribute to it. This is a provocative claim that challenges the perception of political responsibility and accountability.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could be seen as harmful by equating bipartisan actions with fascism, a term with severe historical connotations. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It does not respect the dignity of individuals involved by using a charged term like fascism without specific evidence. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses a broad and inflammatory label. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it makes a sweeping generalization without detailed analysis. [-2]