Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a public issue by discussing the management of protests in Los Angeles and the involvement of political figures, which contributes to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it could contribute to political polarization by framing the situation in opposition to Trump and his allies.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of individuals involved. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on a political narrative rather than fostering dialogue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does present a narrative that could be seen as critical of Trump and his allies without engaging in constructive dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to inform the public about a political issue, though it could be more balanced in its presentation. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.