The statement is a reply to a conversation about the allocation of resources for deporting non-violent undocumented immigrants versus spending on healthcare or housing. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with societal issues related to immigration policy and public spending.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but it is vague and does not contribute positively to the discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks clarity and does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It does not add to the conversation in a meaningful way. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is too brief to offer any substantial critique or discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for societal betterment as it does not provide any constructive input or solutions. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly as it does not contribute meaningfully to the discourse. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.