Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
6/8/2025, 11:41:57 PM
X
In reply to:
Vojtech Müller
@cobalamin_12
·
27d
@McclaneDet @JHochderffer @GaryMarcus How is the fact that he was an intern relevant?
Ron Williams
@McclaneDet
·
27d
@JHochderffer @GaryMarcus The lead author of the Apple paper is an intern there.

Apple is the biggest of many companies who have dropped the ball hard on AI.

Hard to take the paper seriously. Especially the title.
Jeffrey Dean Hochderffer
@JHochderffer
·
27d
It’s becoming increasingly apparent that @GaryMarcus is correct.

New LLM models are producing diminishing returns.

Current models are powerful and useful, but they are short of being reliable autonomous agents capable of replacing the vast human workforce.

New breakthroughs

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages in a discussion about the credibility of research based on the status of the author, referencing historical context to argue that the quality of work is more important than the author's position. The tone is factual and aims to provide a counterpoint to the argument that an intern's work is less credible.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and focuses on the quality of work rather than personal attributes, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by providing historical context to support the argument that the quality of work is what matters, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a counterexample without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle. [+1]