Michael Schellenberger

Rank 46 of 47
|
Score -202
Kamala Harris
@KamalaHarris
·
26d
My statement on what's unfolding in Los Angeles.
6/9/2025, 12:46:17 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
26d
L.A.'s lack of police has been one of the biggest crime stories in California for a decade. As such, @GavinNewsom is either lying or even more in a bubble than we knew. And now, naturally, LA's radical-Left mayor and city council want to cut 400 more police officers.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
26d
There's no shortage of police in L.A., said @GavinNewsom a few hours ago. In fact, L.A. has far fewer police per capita than other big cities. And now, the protesters have overrun the police and blocked the highway. Video: @AnthonyCabassa_
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
26d
It's "inflammatory" to enforce migration laws, say Democrats. But it's not. It's essential for protecting the vulnerable. The reason the Left opposes law enforcement is that they take pleasure at the destruction of civilization, at least so long as it only hurts other people.

The statement criticizes Kamala Harris, accusing her of supporting policies that allegedly decriminalize certain crimes and harm poor and working-class communities. It uses strong language and makes claims about her intentions and actions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses inflammatory language, which could contribute to harm by misrepresenting intentions and actions, thus violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual it criticizes, potentially engaging in a form of public shaming or harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses accusatory language without providing evidence or context. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it relies on personal attacks rather than addressing specific policies or actions with evidence. [-2]