Michael Schellenberger

Rank 46 of 47
|
Score -202
Anthony
@AnthonyCabassa_
·
25d
BREAKING 🚨: Protestors light an American Flag on fire in an attempt to light another WayMo vehicle on fire.

Still no police or firefighter response to the fires. Things are quickly escalating.

Los Ángeles, CA
6/9/2025, 12:54:08 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
25d
@GavinNewsom No shortage of police, @GavinNewsom ?
Anthony
@AnthonyCabassa_
·
25d
BREAKING 🚨: A second WayMo has just been lit on fire by protestors. No police present. This is a major escalation from just one hour ago. Thousands of protestors in the streets.

Los Angeles, CA
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
25d
@GavinNewsom Kamala Harris did more than anyone to pass the initiative that decriminalized open air drug dealing and shoplifting. She’s pro-crime because she’s against civilization — at least for poor and working class people, not her and her neighbors.
Kamala Harris
@KamalaHarris
·
26d
My statement on what's unfolding in Los Angeles.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
26d
L.A.'s lack of police has been one of the biggest crime stories in California for a decade. As such, @GavinNewsom is either lying or even more in a bubble than we knew. And now, naturally, LA's radical-Left mayor and city council want to cut 400 more police officers.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
26d
There's no shortage of police in L.A., said @GavinNewsom a few hours ago. In fact, L.A. has far fewer police per capita than other big cities. And now, the protesters have overrun the police and blocked the highway. Video: @AnthonyCabassa_
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
26d
It's "inflammatory" to enforce migration laws, say Democrats. But it's not. It's essential for protecting the vulnerable. The reason the Left opposes law enforcement is that they take pleasure at the destruction of civilization, at least so long as it only hurts other people.

The statement 'Massive surplus of police' is a sarcastic response to a discussion about police presence and crime in Los Angeles. It engages in public discourse by addressing issues of law enforcement and public safety. The tone is critical and dismissive, suggesting disagreement with the notion that there is no shortage of police.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but uses sarcasm to critique a public figure's stance.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but could be seen as dismissive, potentially undermining respectful dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead uses sarcasm, which may not foster productive dialogue. [-1]