Michael Schellenberger

The statement critiques media and political leaders in California for allegedly downplaying crime and dismissing public concerns as moral panic or racism. It suggests a disconnect between official narratives and public perception.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement may cause harm by potentially inflaming tensions and distrust between the public and media or political leaders. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It accuses media and leaders of dismissing concerns as racism, which could be seen as disrespectful and dismissive of their intentions. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses accusatory language, which may hinder productive discussion. [-1]