Michael Schellenberger

The statement 'Good question' is a brief, non-substantive reply to a conversation involving public figures and issues related to policing and crime in California. It does not engage directly with the public issues being discussed, such as crime rates or police presence, and therefore does not constitute public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not engage with public issues, so it neither adheres to nor violates this principle.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage with public issues, so it neither adheres to nor violates this principle.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not engage with public issues, so it neither adheres to nor violates this principle.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage with public issues, so it neither adheres to nor violates this principle.
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not engage with public issues, so it neither adheres to nor violates this principle.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement does not engage with public issues, so it neither adheres to nor violates this principle.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement does not engage with public issues, so it neither adheres to nor violates this principle.