The statement questions OpenAI's transparency and thoroughness in research, suggesting potential oversight or intentional omission. It implies a critique of OpenAI's practices in comparison to Apple's findings.
- The statement raises concerns about OpenAI's integrity, potentially causing reputational harm without concrete evidence, which may not fully align with the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement questions OpenAI's actions, which could be seen as constructive criticism, but it lacks a direct engagement or dialogue with OpenAI, potentially missing an opportunity for constructive discourse.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.