Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -90
6/9/2025, 2:48:59 AM
X
In reply to:
Tomi Lahren
@TomiLahren
·
3d
@shellenberger @GavinNewsom @MayorOfLA @KamalaHarris They want it to be destroyed
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
3d
Everybody in L.A. knows there aren't enough police officers. It has little more than half as many per capita as Chicago. And yet @GavinNewsom @MayorOfLA @KamalaHarris and *every single* Democratic governor opposed calling out the National Guard.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
3d
There's no shortage of police in L.A., said @GavinNewsom a few hours ago. In fact, L.A. has far fewer police per capita than other big cities. And now, the protesters have overrun the police and blocked the highway. Video: @AnthonyCabassa_

The statement is part of a broader discussion on law enforcement and political decisions in Los Angeles. It implies agreement with a critical view of certain political figures and their policies regarding police presence and public safety.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement implies harm by suggesting that political figures want destruction, which could be seen as inflammatory. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the individuals mentioned, as it attributes negative intentions without evidence. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes a broad accusation. [-2]