Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 76
In reply to:
VraserX e/acc
@VraserX
·
9d

The statement is part of a discussion about AI's capabilities in solving math problems, specifically addressing concerns about data augmentation and training. The tone is assertive, indicating frustration with the perceived lack of engagement in the discussion. The intent is to emphasize the importance of addressing the augmentation issue and to signal a potential withdrawal from the conversation if it remains unaddressed.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm but expresses frustration, which could be seen as a minor negative impact on the dialogue.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement threatens to disengage rather than constructively addressing the disagreement, which could be seen as a minor violation of engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]