Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement refers to a public figure, Carla Hayden, discussing her removal from a significant public position, which constitutes public discourse as it involves engagement with public issues and governance. The tone is neutral and factual, providing information about a broadcast where Hayden speaks on her removal.
- The statement itself does no harm; it neutrally reports on a public figure's discussion.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not include any derogatory or harmful language.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By reporting on a public figure's discussion, it potentially promotes understanding of the circumstances surrounding her removal. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it simply reports on an event.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to inform the public about a significant event involving a public figure, contributing to civic dialogue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on a public figure's expression of her experiences. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.