In reply to:
Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
@RepRashida
·
17d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the actions of ICE, a government agency, and advocating for its abolition due to perceived illegal actions and negative impacts on safety and rights. It aligns with a broader conversation about government power and civil rights.
- The statement does not directly harm others but criticizes an institution, which can be seen as a form of constructive criticism rather than harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the negative impact of ICE's actions on families and communities. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of ICE and does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for societal change by calling for the abolition of ICE to protect rights. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss public policy and civil rights issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.