In reply to:
The statement is a direct and brief disagreement with a proposal to pass a bill related to border security. It does not provide reasoning or engage in detailed discussion, but it does express a clear stance on a public policy issue.
- The statement does not cause harm but lacks constructive engagement.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy as it is a simple negation without explanation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or provide reasons for disagreement. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.