Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
6/10/2025, 12:38:02 AM
X
In reply to:
Rep. Hogsworth
@AugustHogsworth
·
27d
@marwilliamson @Acyn I could call you a charlatan hack, but really, you are a symptom of America's inability to express their malcontent with modernity through traditional means of dissemination. You make money off of the struggles of the poor, you help no one but you. I find you beyond disgusting.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
27d
@AugustHogsworth @Acyn Interesting you’re from Oklahoma. Alma Wilson was a good friend and a mentor to me. Sad to see a Congressman down in the mud. And I do not write self-help books.
Rep. Hogsworth
@AugustHogsworth
·
27d
@marwilliamson @Acyn Shouldn't you be shilling self-help books?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
28d
@Acyn I’ve never been much of a Gavin Newsom fan but he’s killing it right now. Big respect.
Acyn
@Acyn
·
28d
Newsom responds to Homan statement on possibly arresting him: He's a tough guy. Why doesn't he do that? He knows where to find me. Lay your hands off four year old girls that are trying to get educated. Come and arrest me. Let’s just get it over with tough guy. I don’t give a

The statement is a defensive response to a personal attack, highlighting achievements and charitable contributions. It attempts to counter the accusation of exploiting struggles for personal gain by emphasizing support for free enterprise and philanthropy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement attempts to defend against a personal attack without escalating hostility, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The response respects privacy but engages in a public dispute, which can affect dignity.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a defensive dialogue rather than constructive criticism, which partially aligns with the principle.