Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
6/10/2025, 5:26:02 AM
X
In reply to:
ghandiz
@StevieGhandiz
·
28d
@marwilliamson @AlanaKStewart you're literally protecting criminals
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
29d
@AlanaKStewart Not criminals, Alana. No one wants to protect criminals. But not all those people they're rounding up - Steven Miller says he wants 3,000 a day! - are criminals. Much of the time they don't even KNOW who they are! And the narrative that if you entered here illegally you're by
Alana Stewart
@AlanaKStewart
·
29d
@marwilliamson Wake up and protect criminals???
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
29d
Dictators have a tough time once people start to wake up.
City of Glendale, CA
@MyGlendale
·
29d
After careful consideration, the City of Glendale has decided to end its agreement with U.S. Homeland Security/ICE to house federal immigration detainees.
This local decision reflects our core values: public safety, transparency, and community trust.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing political issues related to criminality and immigration policy. It questions the focus on certain narratives and brings up a political figure's legal issues, which can be seen as an attempt to shift the conversation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by using charged language ('34 counts convicted felon') which may not contribute to a constructive dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment but uses a confrontational tone that may not respect the dignity of others involved in the conversation. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it shifts the focus to a political figure's legal issues rather than addressing the original topic constructively. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead uses a personal attack on a political figure, which detracts from a productive dialogue. [-1]