Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
6/10/2025, 6:23:19 AM
X
In reply to:
FreeSpeechGirl
@FreeSpeechGirl
·
29d
@marwilliamson I wasn't talking about any non violent protests going on in LA. I'm only talking about the violent ones where people are lighting cars on fire. I'm sure you've seen the videos. People living in THAT area would absolutely want the marines in their streets and the violent rioters
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
29d
@FreeSpeechGirl The vast majority of these protests are NOT violent, the Mayors and Governor of California can handle them, and Trump inserting himself this way will only cause more chaos. People living in that area do NOT want the marines in their streets.
FreeSpeechGirl
@FreeSpeechGirl
·
29d
@marwilliamson so you think violent protests should be able to continue? Someone is going to die if it keeps going. Imagine the fear of people living in that area from all the violence.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
29d
I feel the energy shifting. No matter what our politics, most Americans know bringing the military out to control these protests is an overreach at best and betrayal of our Constitution at worst.

The statement is part of a public discourse on the appropriate response to violent protests and the role of federal intervention. It discusses the balance of power between state and federal authorities and the implications of federal intervention against a governor's wishes.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but discusses the potential harm of federal intervention against a governor's request.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by clarifying the process of federal intervention and respecting state authority. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the procedural aspect of federal intervention without personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing the balance of power and respecting state decisions. [+1]